PM's link to Panama and his speech are two separate matters: SC

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan on Tuesday commented that the Prime Minister's discourse in the parliament and his connection to the Panama Leaks outrage were two separate matters and ought not be connected together.

Hearing for the Panama Leaks case continued on Tuesday as PTI attorney Naeem Bukhari displayed his legitimization that there was strife in the announcements of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his child Hussain Nawaz.

Naeem Bukhari contended that there was proof on record against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif as Ishaq Dar's sworn statement in which he had acknowledged that he had laundered cash for him. Be that as it may, the court prompted him to abstain from bringing Dar into the matter and remain concentrated on the London pads.

"What is the purpose of acquiring Ishaq Dar? Is he among the respondents?" he inquired. "Clarify why NAB ought to have documented an interest in the Hudaibya case."

Equity Asif Saeed Khosa reclaimed his words from the day preceding, when he had commented about Article 62 and 63. He expressed that he ought not have given a perception with respect to the matter.

The Supreme Court likewise expressed that it couldn't examine and after that pass out decisions like a trial court.

"We have taken pledge to maintain the constitution. We are not a trial court," said the seat.

Equity Ejaz Afzal expressed that precluding the Prime Minister of Pakistan over suspicions will set an extremely perilous point of reference.

Knowing about the case was suspended till January 11, 2017.